Transcript of Live Chat with
Vilmos Zsigmond, ASC
June 1, 2002

Note: This chat was conducted at ShowBiz Expo at the Los Angeles Convention. Questions were accepted from both our online chat guests and the assembled audience. ShowBiz Expo Audience indicates that question was submitted from one of our guests on-site.

Moderator  (Jun 1, 2002 1:20:38 PM)
Welcome. We're chatting with Vilmos Zsigmond, ASC live from the Demo Stage of Showbiz Expo 2002 at the LA Convention Center.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:24:30 PM)
I'd like to greet everybody here and around the world, who's interested in the world of cinematography.

muscatel (Jun 1, 2002 1:24:33 PM)
Good morning, Vilmos. I recently saw the restored version of The Hired Hand at the Tribeca festival in N.Y. The film was a work of art. Peter Fonda, Verna Bloom and Frank Mazzola spoke to the audience afterwards, and all said the magic was due to a collaboration of the talent of everyone involved. What was it like working with Peter? And how did the editor, Mr. Mazzola, enhance your work?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:25:14 PM)
I had a great time working with Peter. Peter is a great actor. He never directed anything before actually, and the first two weeks I had a difficult time teaching him. My task was really to try to teach him enough in two weeks that he would be able to do his job as a director. Which he actually did, and then took over.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:26:02 PM)
So much that he then would say, stop, I'm the director now. If I'm doing it wrong, tell me and I'll correct it.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:26:27 PM)
Talking a bit about Mr. Mazzola; he was an incredible editor. And I didn't imagine he would do those beautiful montage scenes. He mentioned something at the beginning – but at the end, when he cut it together, I realized his contribution was so tremendous.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:26:55 PM)
I never before worked with an editor who put his stamp on a movie so much. If you see the movie today, you will realize it's 40 years ahead of its time. He's still promoting the movie around the world. It was shown at the Venice Film Festival and in London also.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:27:39 PM)
It's going to be shown at the Seattle Film Festival a week from now. There are other plans also.

Glowbug (Jun 1, 2002 1:27:48 PM)
Hi Vilmos, I would first like to say you've had an amazing career. Your body of work is among the finest in filmmaking history. How do you think the advent of digital media will affect the way you work?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:28:17 PM)
Actually, digital filmmaking should not really alter the art of cinematography.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:28:37 PM)
I know everybody is afraid post-production facilities and people will take over and decide to make a film something it wasn't intended to be. I don't think it will affect cinematographers as much as directors.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:28:54 PM)
I think we welcome everything that can be done to a movie in post-production. Like Hired Hand – the post-production with Mazzola's editing. I think it enhanced it 50 times, though that wasn't digital. We can correct our colors better, correct mistakes we did in the shooting.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:29:45 PM)
You know, many times you work under severe weather conditions. It's raining, you start with overcast and then it's sunny and then back to overcast again. With digital we can improve things so much, we can match shots. Don't be afraid of digital.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:30:20 PM)
Directors will ask questions – why are you using so many lights. I thought digital photography didn't need so many lights? You can shoot available. Well, true, you can shoot available light. We can shoot available light with fast films. You can do everything in film as you can digital. So what is the difference?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:31:16 PM)
Actually, I think you need more lights, better lighting, in order to make the digital photography as good as film photography.

Jim Beau (Jun 1, 2002 1:31:23 PM)
The long-awaited DVD of McCabe & Mrs. Miller comes out tomorrow. Were you involved in the transfer?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:31:47 PM)
I definitely was involved with the transfer. I would like to be involved in the transfer of any of my old movies. I want studios to call me because we can help with the DVD.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:32:18 PM)
Recently with The Long Goodbye, either they couldn't reach me or felt they didn't have to call me. They called me for the interview and I asked them about the transfer. They said, alright, let's correct this mistake and showed me what they did – and it was all wrong.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:33:15 PM)
When we shot The Long Goodbye, we shot in a style with a lot of flashing and diffusion. I pushed the film. With digital post-production they eliminated that look and it looked like we shot the movie yesterday. It was contrasty. It looked okay, but it wasn't the way I shot it. But they said they wanted to satisfy me, and so we did the whole transfer over the next week and now it looks the way we shot it.

Panasmith (Jun 1, 2002 1:33:51 PM)
How was it shooting a film like Ghosts in the Darkness, was it a long shoot? How did you crew hold up? did you have many problems?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:34:39 PM)
It was very difficult, because we were in South Africa, and the equipment was not really first rate. It was a little bit under that. We didn't have a Moscow light. I would have needed sometimes four Moscow lights to shoot our set, which was built on location. It was probably a square mile basically. And we had some night shooting. I tried to do a lot of them at dusk, with sort of dusk for night.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:35:59 PM)
But we had a problem when we had to shoot in total darkness. We used a lot of fires, and torches. It was very difficult to shoot the dark night. That's usually all cinematographers' problem when you have to shoot night and make it believable. That it doesn't look lit. If you use too many lights, strong lights, it makes it look like a bad movie.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:36:42 PM)
I try to avoid that if I can. The shoot was quite long. I think we were there for 3-1/2 months shooting. And we had problems with the lions because, of course ,you could not shoot the lions – you cannot tell them what to do and how to do it.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:37:09 PM)
One lion was especially good for us, a very gentle lion. He could do tricks – he would jump on his trainer, who had put a piece of meat in the trainer's pocket. Imagine a 500-lb lion jumping on your chest. Also, the trainer was a Hungarian also, so he was a bit crazy.

Ken (Jun 1, 2002 1:37:50 PM)
In Close Encounters the use of lighting to portray the space craft was a key to its being credible. What kind of problems did that effect pose for you?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:38:42 PM)
In Close Encounters, the special effects were really difficult because we didn't have digital post production yet. With digital, it would have been a snap, but in those days everything had to be optical effects. We had a genius, Doug Tremble, who really helped us get wonderful effects. Sometimes he had to make 9 or 10 passes on the same negative, which is why we had to use 65mm film.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:39:45 PM)
We were very proud of this film, because that was the first time you saw a special effects movie, and you could not tell the difference between a piece of film that had the special effects and what didn't. Before that you always saw grain jumping, and it was always a second rate quality. People could tell – ah ha, coming to an effect again. With Close Encounters, you could not tell that. All the film had exactly the same quality.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:40:34 PM)
To do that, we decided to destroy a little the original footage. We pushed the film, over-developed it, to get a bit more grain, a little funkier looking. Even if you shot on 65mm film, with all the effects, we knew it wouldn't have 100percent quality, maybe 75percent for the quality. For the effects. That's why the whole movie looks the same and people think the UFOs are real.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:41:19 PM)
As far as the lighting goes, we had to use a lot of lighting. We figured out that if there ARE UFOs, and I think there are UFOs, but unfortunately, we haven't seen them landing yet. At least I haven't seen it.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:41:55 PM)
But we imagined if the UFOs were landing, when the door opens there would be an incredible amount of light. They are living in the future, with better technology. With a lot of lighting etc.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:42:43 PM)
My biggest problem was when the spaceship door opens, maybe 150 feet wide or something, and an incredible amount of light is coming out. How to create that effect?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:43:07 PM)
The production designer tried using about 1000 lightbulbs – but the door opened and nothing happened. The individual lights didn't give the effect. So we decided to use bollow spots – about eight of them. And we used fog, because light rays only basically show up if you have an atmosphere. And we realized it still didn't do the job. Then somebody came up with the idea maybe we should use mirrors, maybe if we break the mirrors into pieces, it will break the light into individual shafts of light.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:44:27 PM)
Once you did that, it became the incredible effect when the people are coming down the ramp and they are surrounded by millions of light rays. That was my favorite scene in the movie, because magic was created at that moment.

Tamas Bojtor (Jun 1, 2002 1:44:40 PM)
Vilmos!! Just connecting to the subject you're talking about now....the director I'm about to work with has the option to use 24p, or 35mm....she is asking me which one to choose....well, which one would you choose with all the knowledge you've accumulated?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:45:22 PM)
I think that's an easy question – do you have the money to shoot on film?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:45:35 PM)
That's the only criteria. If you want the best quality for a motion picture, at the moment, you still have to shoot on film. There's no other way to get the quality on screen.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:45:56 PM)
For somebody who doesn't have enough money, I would not tell him to use film, because it does take more money. But I hope that eventually everybody will have enough to shoot on film. But if you don't shoot on whatever – 16mm, digital, whatever – but the story must be done, one way or the other.

Misha (Jun 1, 2002 1:46:32 PM)
Good morning Vilmos. I am a big fan of yours and am looking forward to hearing you in person at the events that you will be attending at the Seattle International Film Festival. I hope also to meet you in person at these events. I was wondering if you could talk about the flashing process which you first used in McCabe and Mrs. Miller.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:47:10 PM)
When I met Robert Altman, he wanted to have a special look for the movie. He explained to me he would like it to look like old faded pictures, with saturated colors.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:47:20 PM)
The movie should look as if it were shot in 1890, when there was no camera and no film. But if there was a camera and film, that's how it would look today. It was very clear what he wanted. And it just happened that I was already involved in testing flashing.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:47:52 PM)
I didn't invent it. Fred Young was the first one who used it in a movie called The Deadly Affair.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:48:03 PM)
And it just happened that Cinematographer Magazine had an article, and I knew it would be incredible when we are shooting under low lighting conditions. You can get more exposure into the shadows. You can sort of see in to the dark.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:48:53 PM)
And since McCabe & Mrs. Miller was made in the late 1800s, when you only had candlelight, fire effects, lanterns, I thought it would be great. I told Altman about it, and Altman being really the ultimate researcher in new looks, he immediately got it and said, that sounds great, let's do it. And that's how it began.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:49:29 PM)
We had to do tests – what kind of deterioration of the film did we want? 10 percent 20 percent? 25 percent?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:49:48 PM)
We actually decided we would treat each scene differently, whatever that scene requires. More flashing or less flashing. Eventually we ended up between 10 percent and 25 percent all the way through the film.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:50:16 PM)
There was the very end sequence where we didn't flash the film, because we wanted it to be really stark and real. That's where Warren Beatty as McCabe dies and Julie Christy is in an opium den.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:50:51 PM)
Since we thought that the film has to be more dramatic and a little bit reminiscent of today, our times. So to bring it back from a period film and really make it look real. That's why the film starts out very hazy, it's raining. And in the end it's very stark and real.

zsigmond daughter (Jun 1, 2002 1:51:25 PM)
What do you have in the works now?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:51:48 PM)
My daughter is always interested in what I'm doing next – she's always dying to see my next movie. Unfortunately, I'm not so busy now, like a lot of people in Hollywood.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:52:11 PM)
I did a movie last year called Bank Ban and that was an opera film. It's just finished. We did the English subtitles in Hungary, and we will have a presentation next month for a few people. Hopefully we will find someone who wants to release the film, which may be difficult because I don't know how many people are interested in opera.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:53:24 PM)
Anyhow, I had a great time shooting that movie because I went to my home country and found an incredible crew. We shot it in six weeks. Not a long schedule, but the enthusiasm of those people was incredible. It's a Hungarian national treasure, this opera film. Great music, great singing.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:54:46 PM)
We have great stars – two well-known singers Ava Marton and Andrea Rost – if you see operas in New York or Los Angeles you will know them. I have great hope that Americas finally will be able to listen to a Hungarian opera, which I don't think anyone has ever seen or heard here in the United States.

Tamas Bojtor (Jun 1, 2002 1:55:02 PM)
When I was home recently, they were showing Bank Ban .....do you wish you could have worked more in Hungary over the years? and how did the hungarian crew differ from the US crews?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:56:14 PM)
Yes, I wish I could have done more in Hungary. I left in 1956 and the only time I went back to shoot a movie was in 1991 when I did a part of Stalin, the HBO movie. We did 3 weeks in Hungary and 6 weeks in Moscow. That's when I met my gaffer in Hungary, who's my friend today. He's a wonderful gaffer and he collects people around him who are not laborers.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:56:49 PM)
You are used to that out of the US that you probably find 1 or 2 good electricians, but the rest are laborers. Richey collects electricians and he teaches them and it's like in Hollywood, where everyone is really good, they can set lights, they can set barn doors, and flags.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:57:35 PM)
In Hungary, the flags are set by electricians. I'm changing that, because I'm trying to teach them you have to have a grip dept. The grips were only pushing the dolly or working around the camera, and all the grip work was done by electricians.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:58:06 PM)
I'm trying to teach them to get into the American system – not the British. And it works much better, faster, more efficient. I must say my crew was so good I didn't actually miss my American crew. I don't like to say that because I love my crew in Hollywood, but the budget was so small we could not actually have paid them.

ShowBiz Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 1:58:42 PM)
What criteria do you use when deciding on a production? Script, director, challenge?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:59:04 PM)
All these. Script is very important for me. I want to be involved with the story. If the story has nothing to say to me, or the audiences, I don't think that picture should be made. I think – what is that picture for? Who's going to enjoy it? That's the most important.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 1:59:34 PM)
Second, for me is working with a director I like. True, it's easy to work with somebody I've worked before. But it not often happens today. Many times I have to start with a new director. So it's important to find out if you are thinking alike.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:00:20 PM)
I can follow directions, it's easy. I think a cinematographer has to do the director's movie. You cannot make two movies. I can't take over the director's job. It's unfair but it's also not good. A movie should have one vision. I am there to help that vision come through.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:00:53 PM)
When you get together with a director the first time, you have a conversation for about a half hour. We will know immediately if we want to work together. Many times the relationship ends there and we we'll never work together because aren't suited. The challenge, of course, is always important. I think we have to be challenged. We must be.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:01:51 PM)
Like the Lakers had to be challenged last night!

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:02:07 PM)
I have to be challenged with something difficult but it's important to get it right so it will be a good picture the audience will like. That happened many times in my career where the challenge was immense. Like Deerhunter, Close Encounters.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:02:58 PM)
Or Witches of Eastwick – I don't usually do comedies, but it was challenge. On many of the movies – like Ghost in the Darkness – the biggest challenge there was the weather. We were shooting in a stormy season in Africa. The sun would come out for 5 minutes then go in, then it was raining. And we had a schedule to follow? What to do?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:03:37 PM)
The schedule is probably more important than anything else. You have to finish the movie, because that's all the money the producer has. So that's a challenge to overcome those problems – the lions who wouldn't do what we wanted. We had some animatronic lions who wouldn't do what we wanted to.

David Walpole (Jun 1, 2002 2:04:08 PM)
In regards to Deliverance...what do you remember as the most difficult sequence to shoot & why?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:04:46 PM)
The most difficult sequence – there were a lot – but looking at the film someone would think the most difficult was to shoot the canoes going through very rough water. That was a challenge actually to capture that for the audience, the way you feel you are in the canoe. You can turn over, go under water, maybe stay under for 30 seconds. So that was a physical challenge as to how to portray that.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:05:29 PM)
John Boorman and myself, we took canoeing lessons for two weeks. Originally we thought those scenes would be with stunt people, but that would not be good. Stunt people are great, but you have to hide them. You have to shoot from a long range or the back, you cannot see facial expressions.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:06:45 PM)
We used a trick. We learned canoeing and when the actors arrived, we invited them to see what we had done. And they were curious – how did we get so good at canoeing. They said, it's nothing to it – if you did it, we can.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:07:11 PM)
So they got in the canoes and turned over a couple times – it took a while to get used to it. But eventually the actors became very good at it. And when we started to shoot, we only used stuntmen occasionally.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:07:41 PM)
This was the greatest film about the river – it looked real. If films don't look real, it turns out the audience – it's not a good question.

ShowBiz Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 2:07:57 PM)
What is your advice to film students? Should they major in still photography, then go to grad school for cinematography?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:08:31 PM)
I don't know what majoring means – you just have to do still photography.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:09:07 PM)
If you start taking pictures at 10, then by 18 you should be a good photographer. The still photography is a base for cinematography. I know there are cinematographers who are not great still photographers. But then they actually need a good director who is really visual and probably a cinematographer by himself. Also they may need a good operator.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:09:55 PM)
But I think looking at my colleagues, they are all good still photographers. Like Haskell Wexler or Conrad Hall.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:10:24 PM)
In fact, we are going to have an exhibit pretty soon where cinematographers are going to enter – all ASC members are going to enter one still photograph. Then we will have an exhibit. It will be interesting to see what subjects we choose and how good we are.

McC (Jun 1, 2002 2:10:47 PM)
I watched a documentary on Mark Rydell this morning and realized you had worked with him on several films, including The River. How difficult was that production, given that you had to control (or not) a natural river?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:11:20 PM)
I did four movies with Mark. It was great working with him, because he's really visually oriented and he gives his cinematographers freedom to help him out. It's not that he needs that help, but he always says, “I don't mind taking advice for anything. In the long run, it's my credit actually.” And that's the way it should be, because he's the one who collects what is good, from many advisors.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:12:22 PM)
As far as the river sequences, we actually had a great time in Tennessee because we controlled a whole river. We dammed up the river where our farm was. All we had to do was call the Tennessee water district and say, “Start giving us water.”

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:12:48 PM)
Then in two hours we would have a controlled flood. We could flood the farm and unflood the farm. We could do that easily. Of course, that was probably a million dollars to build the dam!

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:13:22 PM)
We did that on Deliverance also – we had a controlled waterfall. We had a sequence where the actors leave the control and are swimming for their lives. The place we worked at Talulah Gorge, there was a dam and they could control the water coming down our waterfall. It's like being in a Hollywood Studio. We had an immense amount of water that we didn't have to pump back up.

ShowBiz Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 2:14:20 PM)
Who was the best director you ever worked with and why?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:14:44 PM)
I work with great directors all the time. I really mean that.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:14:50 PM)
I've been lucky. Luck is very important. Skill is one thing – we talk about what great artists we are – but we cannot be great artists if we don't have directors who give us action.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:15:29 PM)
I've worked with Robert Altman and Brian De Palma. I worked with Mark Rydell for four movies. Steven Spielberg on two. And that doesn't mean the directors I worked with once or twice were not good directors. Jerry Schatzberg. Irwin Winkler, who is a producer. He only did three pictures and the last one I did was Life as a House. I thought he was a great director. Sometimes it's difficult coming from a producer, but he manages. Steven Hopkins who did Ghost in the Darkness, an Australian. Also a terrific director.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:17:24 PM)
I'm sure I didn't mention a lot of others – but I've been lucky. The credit I've got, I have to thank the directors. The credit has to go many times also to the production designers. They are great helpers.

ShowBix Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 2:18:42 PM)
As judge for the Lake Arrowhead Int. Film Festival, I learned that you have personally provided assistance to beginning film creators who are submitting short films to competitions. This is a contribution of great importance. Thank you. My question is: How early in pre-production is it ideal to begin consulting with the Director?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:19:27 PM)
I grew up in Hungary and got into the Hungarian film biz. In Hungary, the director and cinematographer start from day one together. The moment the director has a script, first thing he calls the cinematographer, then they work on everything together. Very unusual. In Hollywood, it's not that way. Sometimes here I'm lucky I get four weeks of prep.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:20:23 PM)
With Irwin Winkler on Life as a House, when we made the deal I said I wanted to be there from the beginning. Of course, they could not pay me for 12 weeks of prep, nobody has that money. But we did it on and off, weekends, and I was there for every phase. Which was important because we built a whole neighborhood in Palos Verdes.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:21:25 PM)
So it was important I was there and it was great for me also. We had discussions almost every day with the production designer. We appreciated other very much – did we need windows, light sources. It was great. That's the way it should be. It should be continuous work from the beginning.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:22:09 PM)
Unfortunately, the way the business is set up in Hollywood, we are hired by the week, not the picture. We should be above the line, following the movie from day one to the end. Especially now we have so much post-production going on – it's very important we follow the movie to the very end.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:22:45 PM)
There are so many things in post where we can improve the movie. I don't think we're there yet, but I hope that's going to happen.

ShowBiz Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 2:23:11 PM)
How has your relationship changed over the years with your operator... considering how much video assist has improved? And what is your routine during a take with regard to video assist?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:24:13 PM)
I had a hard time in the beginning with operators in Hollywood because in Hungary the DP operates. It was so strange for me. I had a tremendous problem with my union who said I couldn't operate. I was penalized. It was unbelievable in those days.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:24:48 PM)
But the first step was I found an operator who was willing not to operate. The union usually didn't know about it, but sometimes there were spies and they would threaten to throw me out of the union.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:25:37 PM)
But then I went to the next step, sometimes the operator would set up a second camera – and maybe he just wasn't a good operator and so that didn't work.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:26:34 PM)
So then I made a good operator my assistant. I trained him to be my assistant – Nick McClaine. He became such a good operator, that I didn't mind to leave the camera for him. And I started to leave him more and more often. And I realized I could do a better job by concentrating on the lighting – and the politics with the director.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:27:00 PM)
It's important to have a relationship with the director, get involved with his plans, the next shot, the next day. As a DP it's important to be up to date with his ideas. I've done that until today. But sometimes I get itchy and have to get behind the camera.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:27:42 PM)
Instead of the Mickey Mouse video screen, which doesn't show a real image, sometimes I have to look through the camera. I do that more often when we use two cameras. And the style today is two cameras. Many times I end up with the second camera.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:28:31 PM)
So I'm actually trying to help, because usually we don't have a second operator on low budget movies, which I have been doing lately. So it's a difficult situation. It's not that I mind to operate the second camera – I love it. Of course, if you are doing $100 million picture then you can hire 2-3 operators and I don't have to.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:29:26 PM)
With video assist, if I have two operators on the set, occasionally I will have to watch the replay in order to see if both cameras capture the scenes I wanted. But I still feel I can see better if I'm standing next to the camera, watching the real actors, not the picture of the actors on the video.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:29:58 PM)
Many directors today are stuck by the video monitor, which I think is totally wrong. You cannot really see real acting on the monitor. It's small and doesn't have the impact. You can't tell if the actors' performance was good enough. But go to a studio today, where are you going to find a director? At the video monitor. Rather than standing next to the camera and watching that.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:31:06 PM)
It gets to the point in an important scene the actor doesn't go to the director to see how it was, they go to the DP and ask "How was I?" because they know you can see the performance better.

Panasmith (Jun 1, 2002 2:31:12 PM)
You recently gave Lazlo his Lifetime achievement award have does it feel for both of you to have come so far and be so successful? What was you proudest moment if you could have only one?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:32:00 PM)
When I got my ASC Lifetime Achievement, I was very happy to be respected by my peers.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:32:35 PM)
However, I was also sad, because Laszlo was not recognized  because we were friends from day one. So when I got my award, I jokingly told Laszlo he deserved half of it. That's how I felt about it. And then three years later when Laszlo got it, I was so happy to give it to him.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:32:59 PM)
I was almost crying actually that finally the day had arrived that we both had the award. And he wanted to give me half back then. So it's nice to be respected by Hollywood and the world. But without Laszlo I wouldn't be here, and he probably would say the same thing.

ShowBiz Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 2:33:33 PM)
From Deliverance, please describe the techniques used in the day-for-night cliff-climbing sequence. In addition to the mattes, was the film solarized? Was flashing used in general?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:34:12 PM)
The Deliverance night scene we tried to accomplish something nobody had tried. Unfortunately it didn't work 100 percent either. Maybe 90 percent — it was a good try.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:34:44 PM)
We wanted to create a white mask of the sky. Usually in day-for-night, you want the blue sky, use a polarizer filter and maybe graduated filters. And you try to make it very dark in the printing. That gives you the night effect. We tested it out and tried to shoot with a white sky and then in the optical house create a mask of everything which is white. And then reverse that.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:36:12 PM)
So basically you are double printing where the scene is printed normally and then print the white sky and everything which his white in the scene – make it dark by printing black into the white areas, and that gives you a night feeling. Because the white sky became a black sky. And a sunlight tree becomes black. It's almost like a solarized effect, if it's not done correctly.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:37:25 PM)
Needless to say the optical house could not do it correctly because in those days we didn't have a perfect registration in the printers. So the skies and trees had a sort of white halo around it – which many critics haled as a great discovery.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:38:03 PM)
But I hated it. It might have been a great effect, but it's not what I wanted. But that's how it turned out. Some of the scenes were perfect – and I didn't understand why sometimes yes and sometimes no.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:38:51 PM)
My favorite shot was when Jon Voight ends up climbing a hill and stands up – and we tilt up the camera into the sky and it's perfect night sky without any of the halo effect. That's how the whole sequence should have looked that.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:39:39 PM)
The waterfall in the background, which was mostly white because the light was shining on the water. There were some highlight details, and that actually became a dark waterfall. It had a lot of grays and darks. Sometimes where there were medium tones it stayed medium because the mask only affected the very highlighted areas. That was really a very interesting affect.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:40:20 PM)
Today, I think it can be done much better because all you have to do is select the highlights and tell the computer to make it dark. In Deliverance it didn't work 100 percent for me, but it will work for you and the computer.

Tamas Bojtor (Jun 1, 2002 2:40:40 PM)
i think turning the words of the script into images that carry emotions is probably the essence of filmmaking...how can this process (which obviously involves the dp just as much as the director) be preserved with shorter and shorter pre production times?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:42:37 PM)
It’s difficult to do with short production times. I think maybe good digital photography can help us in the future that people can work on less expensive way in order to lengthen the production. There's no film in the camera. True at the moment it's a compromise, but if it's done right, the story is good, actors are good, I still think you can make a good picture.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:42:49 PM)
But time is working for you. A painter needs enough time to paint his painting. The director needs time to work with the actors. The actors need time to rehearse and try different things. If you consider film as an art form, I think time will work for us.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:43:35 PM)
Movies are a business, super movies, they are done simply to make money. Unfortunately, that's where I think the digital age – the digital post-production – it doesn't really help the art of filmmaking.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:43:59 PM)
We have movies which millions of people see, but I don't call them artistic films. It's good for making money. But I'm hoping film as an art form exists today and will exist tomorrow. I'm hoping it will get better in the future. Whoever makes or whatever it takes to make filmmaking remain as an art form, I'm for it.

ShowBiz Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 2:44:53 PM)
On Close Encounters, how did you collaborate with Steven Spielberg? On the opening scene, in which the air traffic controllers are crouched over their screen, the screen is reflecting onto their glasses. This is brilliant cinematography. Would you like to work with Spielberg again?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:46:17 PM)
Absolutely yes. Of course, if you can work with someone like Spielberg, it's great. It's good to work with good directors. I don't even mind if they are so good they don't need your help so much. I understand that Spielberg makes filmmaking so much that he operates the camera sometimes. Why not? He's in a position to do it. He knows so much about filmmaking that he could probably make the movie by himself.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:46:36 PM)
The same with Stanley Kubrick. He was a total filmmaker. He would design the sets. He would light the sets himself. He would probably do everything. It's not that he didn't trust other people, but I think he had such a great vision that he thought only he is the one who could do that.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:47:15 PM)
I don't see anything wrong with that. I don't mind working with someone who has great ideas. If I could just once a day come up with something he would accept, I would be happy to improve it. But still, Steven does let his DP do the lighting.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:48:18 PM)
Lighting, for me, is crucial. That's where we talked a little bit about those producers who want to shoot digital because they think lighting isn't necessary anymore. That digital cameras are so sensitive that you can shoot anywhere any time. Which is true but is it an artistic effect? That's the question.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:48:47 PM)
A director wants to tell a story, and if it's not a documentary, if it's a story about people and you have to create mood, you need lighting. And you will need lighting as long as you make movies. And this is where the cinematographer's art comes in.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:49:27 PM)
You can tell a good cinematographer by looking at the images and the mood he created. That's our best tool. The camera move is important, yes. Everything else is important actually. Everything which tells the story easier and faster and more artistically is fine. But lighting is the only thing in which the cinematographer can call that's really the cinematographer's territory, and we should really keep it that way.

ShowBiz Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 2:50:07 PM)
The camera and a beautiful woman: how do you make her look so beautiful?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:50:38 PM)
First, the actors and the women should look beautiful without us even trying. The beauty actually comes from inside out many times.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:51:01 PM)
For example, Bette Midler, a great actress, a great singer. If you look at her closely, on the street, at a party, you would think she is not beautiful. And I was scared at first when I had to photograph her?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:51:25 PM)
I said to Mark Rydell – she's the star of The Rose, what the hell are we going to do?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:51:34 PM)
We tried all sorts of filters, and actually in the tests, nothing really worked. But the only thing that worked, when we were on the set, and Mark Rydell said “Action!” That's when Bette Midler became beautiful. Because she was an incredible performer and you forget about all the devices. Because she was beautiful, and that was the secret.

George Spiro Dibie (Jun 1, 2002 2:52:12 PM)
The ICG Film Showcase with short films from the Guild's talented young cinematographers is screening here at Showbiz Expo tomorrow – have you seen it and what do you think?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:53:13 PM)
I think those films are incredibly wonderfully made, wonderfully shot. And I was really so surprised because I watch student films and I must say they are improving every year.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:53:42 PM)
I get to the point where I want to know – why am I shooting films anymore myself? We have all these young people who can do it better. The level of technical knowledge and the artistic approach is wonderful. I think we have a future here. All these people show talent.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:54:09 PM)
I haven't seen any movie which is only gimmicky. They are all honest real films. It's a continuous showing here at Showbiz – please see them, you will be very surprised.

Bob Fisher (Jun 1, 2002 2:54:41 PM)
I understand you started your career credited as William Zsigmond. When did your name change and why?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:55:41 PM)
My name in Hungary was Vilmos. When I came to the US and was getting my citizenship, they told me I should change my name. Why? Nobody is going to be able to learn two difficult names. Vilmos Zsigmond. You have to change one.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:55:45 PM)
So I made it William. I never really liked it. My friends hated it.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:56:07 PM)
When I worked with Peter Fonda on The Hired Hand he said, “Should I call you William? No, you don't look William to me at all. What was your Hungarian name?” I said, “Vilmos.”

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:56:30 PM)
He said, “What a beautiful, beautiful name, I will call you that.” And that's the credit on the movie. So he's my godfather, and I appreciate him giving my name back to me.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:56:56 PM)
Incidentally Laszlo's name was Leslie in those days, and he became Laszlo about the same time I became Vilmos.

ShowBiz Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 2:57:03 PM)
What is your best film cinematography from your point of view, and why?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:57:30 PM)
Tough question actually. I have so many films I really like. One year I like this better, another year I like another film better.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:57:51 PM)
But objectively speaking, I think the best film all around – for direction, story, performances, cinematography - would be Deerhunter.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:58:08 PM)
That's first position. Then there are so many I could give you a list. Close Encounters, McCabe & Mrs. Miller, The Rose, Cinderella Liberty, Scarecrow. There are more, but all these movies are very kind to me. I must say most of these movies were shot in the '70s, or early '80s.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 2:59:18 PM)
In Seattle Film Festival there is going to be a retrospective of the '70s movies, including The Hired Hand.

ShowBiz Expo Audience (Jun 1, 2002 2:59:26 PM)
You were honored in the Hungarian Parliament... How did you feel at that time? And what would you want to leave to this world?

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 3:00:12 PM)
I was actually awarded in Hungary with the Corvin Chain, which was only given to 12 people this year in Hungary. And I was the only filmmaker who got this. Ever. I was very much honored. I'm very happy that finally a filmmaker got an award like this, so they recognize film as an art form.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 3:00:56 PM)
And what I'm going to leave behind, I think I'm going to leave the Corvin Chain behind me because when I die, it goes to another person, but that is probably the best thing I will leave behind.

Vilmos Zsigmond  (Jun 1, 2002 3:01:53 PM)
Thanks very much for being here for this chat. I feel very honored to have been here, and I wish good luck to all the students who were listening and a good future. There is a good future in cinematography. Don't listen to those people who say digital photography is going to kill it. It won't because we won't let them do it to us.